SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 1587

In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
B.R. GAVAI & S.B. SHUKRE, JJ.
Vilas
Versus
State of Maharashtra & Another
Writ Petition No. 2758 of 2014
Decided on : 11-08-2014

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:N.R. Saboo, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Bharti Dangre, Government Pleader with S.M. Ghodeswar, Assistant Government Pleader.

Procedural irregularities and illegal exercise of jurisdiction can lead to the setting aside of orders and the direction for proper adherence to the prescribed legal procedures.

Headnote:

Hierarchy - Licensing Issue - Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953, Rule 44(A); Bombay Prohibition Act, Section 137, 138 - The court discussed the application of the petitioner for a liquor license, the opposition from the Superintendent of Police and the Principal of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, and the decision-making process of the Committee. The court highlighted the procedural irregularities in the decision-making process and the illegal exercise of jurisdiction by the Hon'ble Minister, ultimately setting aside the order and directing the Commissioner of State Excise to decide the appeal in accordance with the law.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner applied for a liquor license, which was opposed by the Superintendent of Police and the Principal of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya. The Hon'ble Minister set aside the order passed by the Collector and directed the license to be issued to the petitioner.

Finding of the Court:

The court found procedural irregularities and illegal exercise of jurisdiction by the Hon'ble Minister, leading to the setting aside of the order and direction for the appeal to be decided by the Commissioner of State Excise.

Issues: Procedural irregularities, illegal exercise of jurisdiction, and the decision-making process of the licensing Committee.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of following the prescribed procedure and highlighted the illegality of the Hon'ble Minister's actions, ultimately setting aside the order and directing the appeal to be decided by the Commissioner of State Excise.

Final Decision: The order passed by the Hon'ble Minister was quashed and set aside. The Commissioner of State Excise was directed to decide the appeal within eight weeks. The petitioner and the representative of the Collector were directed to remain present before the Commissioner of State Excise.

Judgment :

1. On 11/7/2014, we had issued notice in the matter and directed respondent No.2-the Collector, Buldhana to remain present in this Court and show cause as to why he has not given effect to the order passed by the appellate authority.

2. While issuing of notice what is urged before us is that under a rule of hierarchy, when a superior officer passes the order, the subordinate officer is bound to comply with the same. Relying on the same basic principle, without going into the entire brief, we thought that it was necessary to secure the presence of the Collector to show cause as to why he has not complied with the order passed by the appellate authority.

3. When the matter is listed before us, perusal of the affidavit in reply shows that the facts of the case are somewhat otherwise and not as simple as were presented before us when an order was passed on 11/7/2014.

4. Today, with the assistance of the learned Government Pleader, learned Assistant Government Pleader and the learned Advocate for the petitioner, we have had the advantage of going through the entire material on record. The perusal of case file would reveal that the Inspector of Excise, Khamgaon had submitted a report to the Superintendent, State Excise, Buldhana with regard to the application of the petitioner for grant of licence on 04/3/2011. It appears that the said Inspector, on the basis of the measurements of the dining hall, the kitchen, the permit room and the store room, has recommended the proposal of the petitioner for grant of FL-III licence.

5. In the said report, the Inspector of State Excise has observed that the petitioner is having Plot Nos.18, 19 and 30 in Survey No.329 Part No.24 at Shegaon near Navoday Vidyalaya. The report shows that the main entrance of Navoday Vidyalaya is situated at 110 meters from the main door of hotel Adarsh Resort. The report further states that the said premises are not within the distance of 75 meters from S. T. Stand, Bus depot or railway station.

6. However, it appears that the Superintendent of Police, Buldhana, in his report dated 08/6/2011 has opposed the grant of licence on the ground that the said Hotel Adarsh Resort belonging to the petitioner is located on Shegaon - Khamgaon road and it is just adjacent to Jawahar Navoday Vidyalaya. Similarly, the Superintendent of Police, Buldhana had also pointed out that there is Sant Gajanan Maharaj temple and Anand Sagar-tourist spot at Shegaon which are visited by the pilgrims from across the State as well as out of the State in huge numbers. The Superintendent of Police reiterated all these facts in his another report dated 10/10/2012 stating therein that Shegaon town is known as "Pandhari" (Pandharpur) of Vidarbha and number of devotees visit the temple of Shree Gajanan and also Anand Sagar, a tourist spot.

7. It is stated in the affidavit-in-reply of respondent No.2-the Collector, Buldhana dated 29/7/2014 that the application of the petitioner was placed before the Committee constituted as per Rule 44(A) of the Bombay Foreign Liquor Rules, 1953 on 19/12/2012 by his predecessor for consideration of the application for licence. In the said meeting, the Committee decided that since the proposed permit room of the petitioner's Hotel is adjacent to the premises of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya, the opinion of the Jawahar Navodaya vidyalaya in respect of grant of permit room/licence FL-III should be called for. The copy of minutes of the said meeting dated 19/12/2012 is placed on record

8. Accordingly, the opinion of Principal of Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya was called on 01/01/2013, who in turn, vide letter dated 04/01/2013 stated that a special Committee was formed to discuss the issue and the parents of the Vidyalaya strongly opposed the giving permission to the petitioner for sale of liquor and beer since the petitioner's hotel Adarsha Resort is located very close to the School. The opposition was further on the ground that Navodaya Vidyalaya is a residential s























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top