B. R. GAVAI, J. :- Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent of learned counsel for both the parties.

2. Though the petitioner has initially approached this Court being aggrieved by the order passed by respondent no.1 - Committee invalidating the claim of the petitioner of belonging to V.J.N.T., the petitioner has restricted his claim only for seeking protection to his services.

3. The petitioner was initially appointed on daily wages in the respondent no.2 - University on 1st of March, 1990. The Managing Committee of the respondent University vide Resolution dated 22nd of September, 1996 absorbed various employees including the petitioner into the regular employment by Resolution No.199. However, it appears that on 6th January, 1998 the respondent - University has terminated the services of the petitioner. The petitioner, therefore, approached the learned Labour Court at Amravati by filing a complaint being Complaint (ULP) No.8 of 1998. Vide order dated 19th of July, 1999, the learned Labour Court granted an interim relief thereby reinstating the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner continued in the services. The respondent - University addressed a communi