SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 1922

A.P.BHANGALE
Kunda – Appellant
Versus
Haribhau – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: S.L. Kotwal
For Respondents/Defendant: None

JUDGMENT

A.P. Bhangale, J.

1. This appeal is filed by the appellant (original plaintiff) against the judgment and order dated 9-4-2008 passed by Ad hoc District Judge-1, Nagpur in Regular Civil Appeal No. 389 of 2004 which was dismissed. The said appeal arose from the judgment and order dated 12-12-2000 passed by the Civil Judge, J.D. Nagpur District Nagpur in Regular Civil Suit No. 109 of 1995. The suit was decreed along with mesne profits and costs. Narayan Supare had three sons Hussia, Bisan and Mahadev. The family owned ancestral property at village Ibrahimpur, Chanoda and Hiwara with House property at Chanoda. Field at Chanoda was acquired for construction of Dam and compensation was paid. The dispute is in respect of the agricultural land Gat No. 103 situated at village Nandra. According to the appellants, the suit property was purchased on 14-5-1982 under the registered sale deed in the name of Mahadev Supare (predecessor-in-title on behalf of the plaintiffs) from Kavadu Tanba Bhat. The defendant was aged about 9 years at that time. The suit property was cultivated by the respondents. The respondents failed to give share of the respondents after death of Mahadev Supare in the











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top