1. Heard Ms.Seema Sarnaik, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Puneet Chaturvedi, learned counsel for respondent no.1 and Mr. A.R.Patil, learned A.P.P. for respondent no.2 at length.

2. Rule. The learned counsel waive service on behalf of the respondents. At the request and by consent of the parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith and the Application is taken up for final hearing.

3. By this Application, the applicant-wife has prayed for recalling the order dated 20.1.2015 passed by this Court in Criminal Revision Application No.17 of 2015. By that order, Criminal Revision Application No.17 of 2015 preferred by the applicant was dismissed.

4. In support of this application, Ms Sarnaik submitted that Criminal Revision Application No.17 of 2015 was preferred by the wife challenging the Judgment and order dated 17.7.2014 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court No.2, Mumbai in Petition No.E-17 of 2011. She submitted that in that petition, the applicant had claimed maintenance at the rate of Rs. 1,00,000/- per month as and by way of permanent maintenance for herself and both the daughters in terms of prayer clause (f) of the petition under Section 125 of the Code of Crimina