T.V.NALAWADE
Ramesh Manik Patil – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
1. All the applications are filed under section 439 (2) of Criminal Procedure Code ('Cr.P.C.' for short) for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon in C.R. Nos. 71/13 and 73/13 registered in Dharangaon Police Station, Dharangaon for the offences punishable under sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 477-A, r/w. 34 etc. of Indian Penal Code ('I.P.C.' for short) and sections 13 (1) (d) r/w. 13 (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ('PC Act' for short).
2. Learned counsel for respondent/accused Shri. Gangakhedkar from Criminal Application Nos. 4527 and 4529 of 2013 argued the matters. The learned APP also argued and he supported the applicant by submitting that the chargesheet could not be filed due to absence of custody of the applicants and the investigation could not be completed. Learned counsel Mrs. Rashmi Gaur for respondent/accused in Criminal Application Nos. 4526 and 4528 of 2013 submitted that her client has taken away the brief from her and so, she does not want to argue. In the first session, this Court had expressed that this Court will not be granting more time and as the time was given to the same advocate in the pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.