SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Bom) 186

R.M.SAVANT
Prism Reality – Appellant
Versus
Govind Yashwnt Khalade – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Abhijit A. Desai, Advocate.
For the Respondents:R1 to R4, Subhash B. Desai, Advocate.

Judgment :-

1. Rule, with the consent of the Learned Counsel for the parties made returnable forthwith and heard.

2. The writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 is invoked against the order dated 30.07.2014 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Wadgaon Maval, Pune, by which order the application Exh.21 filed by the Petitioner herein under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC on the ground that the suit be dismissed as the proper Court Fees have not been paid came to be rejected.

3. It is not necessary to burden this order with unnecessary details, suffice it to say that the Respondents No.1 to 4 herein are the original Plaintiffs who have filed the suit in question being RCS No.130 of 2013. The substantive relief sought in the suit is a declaration that the Development Agreement No.9272 of 2006 and the Power of Attorney No.9273 of 2006 dated 14.12.2006 are bogus, illegal and not binding on the Plaintiffs. A further declaration that is sought is that the Sale Deed executed by Defendants No.2 and 3 on behalf of Smt. Ranjanaraje Virdhaval Dabhade by virtue of Power of Attorney executed by her, which Sale Deed has been executed in favour of the Defendants No.4 and 5 beari













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top