Naresh Patil, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.

Heard by consent of parties.

2. The petitioner challenges the order of her compulsory retirement passed by the respondents. The contention of the petitioner is that by an order dated 1st September 1990, she was appointed as Judicial Magistrate First Class and posted at Jalgaon. She served at Jalgaon from 1st September 1990 to 3rd March 1991. Thereafter she worked at various places like Wardha, Thane, Karjat, Pune. From 2000 to 2004 the petitioner was posted as Judge, Industrial Court, Mumbai. In the year 2007-08, the petitioner served as Member, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Mumbai. In the year 2011, the petitioner was posted as Member, Family Court, Bandra and thereafter as Additional Judge, Small Causes Court, Mumbai. The first assured progression scale was granted to the petitioner in the year 2003 and the second was granted on 14th December 2011. It is contended that Annual Confidential Reports (“ACRs” for short) for the year 2002 to 2004 were rated as “Good” whereas ACR of 2006 was rated as “Very Good”. The integrity of the petitioner was found to be good on the basis of ACRs. The petitioner has placed on record