SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 2000

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY (AURANGABAD BENCH)
S.S. Shinde & V.L. Achliya, JJ.
State of Maharashtra – Appellants
Vs.
Bharat Manaji Kale and Others – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 383 of 2013
Decided On : 10.10.2014

Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: S.R. Palnitkar, A.P.P.
For Respondents/Defendant:M.L. Sangeet, Advocate.

Headnote:Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 118 Evidence of child witness. An improved and uncorroborated testimony of a child witness, cannot be relied upon. It is highly unsafe to rely upon uncorroborated testimony of such child witness, it is well-settled position in law that while relying upon the testimony of child witness the Court should be very cautious for the reason that due to tender age of the witness they are susceptible to make exaggeration as well as easily tutored by the person who can influence the mind of such child witness.

       [INDIAN] PENAL CODE, 1860 - Section 300 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378 Offence of murder. Where testimony of sole eye-witnesses as to cause of death of deceased was contradictory to post-mortem report therefore, acquittal of accused justified. It is settled position in law that while dealing with an Appeal by High Court the High Court has power to reconsider the whole issue, re-appreciate the evidence and to come to its own conclusion and findings, in place of the findings recorded by the trial Court, if said findings are against the evidence on record, or in other words perverse. While dealing with the appeal against an acquittal, High Court has to keep in mind that the presumption of innocence is still available in favour of the accused and same stands fortified and strengthen by order of acquittal passed in his favour by the trial Court. It is also well-settled position of law that if on fresh scrutiny of the evidence and other material on record.

JUDGMENT

V.L. Achliya, J.

1. This Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13/7/2012 passed in Sessions Case No. 24/10 decided by Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, Dist. Ahmednagar. By the impugned judgment, the trial Court has acquitted both the accused. Being aggrieved by said judgment and order, the appellant/State has preferred leave to appeal vide Criminal Application No. 5279/12. The application was partly allowed. Leave to appeal was rejected as against the original accused No. 2 Viz. Smt. Vithabai Manaji Kale and leave was granted to file appeal as against accused No. 1 - Bharat Manaji Kale. In view of the leave to appeal filed by the State granted against accused No. 1, present Appeal is entertained against the respondent/original accused No. 1. We have heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and Mrs. M.L. Sangeet, counsel appointed to represent the respondent original accused No. 1. With their assistance, we have thoroughly perused the record and proceedings.

2. In brief the facts of prosecution case as unfolded during the course of trial are summarised as under:

(a) Prosecution has approached with the case that the respondent accused No. 1 got married with Baijabai (deceased) in the year 1991. Since after the marriage, the deceased started to cohabit with the respondent. Out of their wedlock, they have begotten two sons and one daughter. They were residing together with accused No. 2 i.e. the mother of respondents/accused No. 1. Accused No. 1 is Shepherd by profession. As part of his profession, accused No. 1 used to carry his sheeps and stay in the agricultural field of person with whom he entered into an agreement to keep his sheeps for grazing in his agricultural field. As a part of profession, he used to move from one place to another alongwith his family.

(b) It is the case of the prosecution that the respondent accused No. 1 was addicted to liquor. He used to ill-treat his wife Baijabai. Number of times, he had beaten his wife under the influence of liquor. In the year 2009, as it was unbearable for her to sustain any more harassment and beating at the hands of her husband, she left her matrimonial house and went to her parents house. On the intervention of relatives of deceased and her husband, the settlement was arrived and respondent/accused has executed "Samzota Patra" on 20/2/2010. By executing the "Samzota Patra" which was scribed on the stamp paper and notarized before the Notary of Public, the respondent/accused made commitment that in future, he will not cause harassment to his wife Baijabai. On 19/2/2010, the respondent/accused and his family which includes his wife, mother, two sons and one daughter, were staying in the agricultural field of one Jagannath Shelke at village Shingave, Tq. Rahata, Dist. Ahmednagar with their sheeps to graze them in the agricultural field of said Jagannath Shelke.

(c) On 20/2/2010, Raosaheb Kale (P.W. 1) the brother of accused informed police posted at Puntamba out post of police station Rahata that wife of his brother Bharat Kale (i.e. accused) has left the house on 19/2/2010, while the members of the family were sleeping and her dead body found to be lying in the well. On the basis of report lodged, police registered the case as accidental death vide A.D. No. 10/10. Police head constable Maruti Avahad to whom investigation was given to make enquiry visited the spot. The dead body of the deceased was taken out from the well. After inquest panchanama, the dead body was referred for postmortem. The spot panchanama was also carried out by police head constable Maroti Avhad. The dead body of the deceased was handed over to her relatives.

(d) After performing last rituals her dead body, on 20/2/2010, the complaint came to be lodged on 21/2/2010 by Anjabhau Kandalkar (P.W. 2) the cousin brother of deceased alleging therein that the respondent accused No. 1 and his mother i.e. the original accused No. 2 had assaulted deceased Baijabai on 19/2/2010













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top