SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 2067

RANJIT MORE, U.V.BAKRE
Nilesh S. Rane – Appellant
Versus
Ravikanth Yadav – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. DEVIDAS 1. PANGAM, Adv. for the Petitioner.
Mr. MAHESH AMONKAR, Adv. for Respondent no.2.

JUDGMENT :

U. V. BAKRE, J. :-

Heard Mr. Pangam, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Amonkar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of respondent no. 2. Respondent no. 1 , though duly served, has been remaining absent.

2. By this petition, the petitioner, working as Police Inspector of Calangute police Station, has taken exception to the order dated 28.11.2013 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, at Mapusa (Magistrate, for short) in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 548/2013/B thereby directing the Police Inspector of Calangute Police Station or any other officer in charge to register the FIR on the basis of complaint dated 28.10.2013 filed by respondent no.1 herein and to conduct detail investigation of the offences as narrated in the complaint and to file report before the Magistrate.

3. Respondent no.1, in his complaint dated 28.10.2013 to the Police Inspector, Calangute Police Station, inter alia, alleged that on several occasions, the petitioner visited the premises namely Mehfil Bar & Restaurant, situated at Naika Wada, Calangute, of which he is the manager and without any justification directed closure of the















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top