SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 2051

A.I.S.CHEEMA
Om prakash – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Shri V.D. SAPKAL, Adv. for applicant.
Mrs. S.G CHINCHOLKAR, A.P.P. for respondents.

JUDGMENT :

Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of parties.

2. This application is by the applicant Om prakash Dhondiram Mane, who claims, he was resident of Thakre Nagar, Aurangabad, and was posted at Majalgaon, District Seed, as Police Inspector at the time of filing of petition. Offence under Sections 498-A, 494 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short) came to be registered against the applicant and other 13 members of the family on 29.1.2008 vide Crime No.24/2008 at the instance of Maya Ramesh Mane. According to the applicant, Ramesh is brother of the present applicant. Ramesh was married to Maya on 9.7.2012. The applicant has been in service since 1985 and is separate from the family. It is claimed that, all the brothers have been living separately and there is no joint family existing. Still the complainant Maya filed complaint claiming that all 14 accused, on 13.1.2008, had gone to Latur and intimidated her, claiming that if she brings Rs.2 Lakhs she would be taken to the matrimonial home. The F.I.R. was filed claiming that this was illtreatment. The investigation has been conducted and charge sheet was filed in the Court of





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top