SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Bom) 2626

SADHANA S.JADHAV
Rashid Saipan Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. I.M. KHAIRDI for Appellant.
Ms. P.P. SHINDE APP for the State.

JUDGMENT :-

The appellant herein stands convicted for offence punishable under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (hereinafter referred to as the N.D.P.S. Act) and is sentenced to undergo R.I. for 10 years and to pay tine of Rs. 50000/- i.d. to suffer R.I for 6 months in Sessions Case No.107 of 2006 by Ad-hoc District Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur vide Judgment and Order dated 11/4/2007. Hence, this appeal.

2. Such of the facts which are necessary for the decision of the appeal are as under:

On 12th• March, 2005 P.S.I. Manoj kumar Yadav who was working as the Chief of the Detection Branch attached to Jail Road Police Station received a secret information at about 2 p.m. that one person namely Rashid Shaikh is to arrive at about 3.30 p.m. in Rahul Gandhi Zopadpatti area near cattle pond along with brown sugar. The informer had given description of his clothes. PSI Yadav transmitted the said information to police inspector of jail road police station. Pursuant to the directions by the P.I., station diary entry to that effect was taken by the P.S.O Gaikwad. P.I. Ingale Patil then gave the said information in writing to the Assistant Commissi




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top