P.V.HARDAS, SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
Sunil Kashinath Chandanshive – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
[Per Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi, J.]
1. All these five Appeals are arising out of one and same Judgment dated 10th February, 2009 in Sessions Case No.260 of 2007 of the 6th Ad- Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai. Hence, they are being decided by this common Judgment. The Appellants are referred to, for the sake of convenience, by their original nomenclature.
2. By the impugned Judgment, Accused Nos.1 to 6 are convicted and sentenced as follows :
Section 143 IPC - R.I. for 6 months and fine of Rs.200/-, in default to suffer R.I. for 1 month.
?Section 144 IPC - R.I. for 1 year and fine of Rs.300/-, in default to suffer R.I. for 1 month.
Section 147 IPC - R.I. for 1 year and fine of Rs.300/-, in default to suffer R.I. for 1 month.
Section 148 IPC - R.I. for 2 years and fine of Rs.500/-, in default to suffer R.I. for 2 months.
Section 37(1)(a) r/w. 135 Bombay Police Act - R.I. for 6 months and fine of Rs.200/-, in default to suffer R.I. for 1 month.
?Section 4 r/w. 25 Arms Act - R.I. for 1 year and fine of Rs.200/-, in default to suffer R.I. for 1 month.
3. Accused Nos.1 to 3 are further convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 r/w. 149 IPC and sentenced to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.