Don't Become Artificial Lawyers: Judges Warn on AI
10 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Warns Young Lawyers on Baseless PILs
10 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Extends Tribunal Tenures Amid Concerns
10 Mar 2026
Long Relationship and Roka Ceremony Justify Anticipatory Bail in Rape on False Promise Case: Delhi High Court
10 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Rejects Kalita's Diary Reconstruction Plea
10 Mar 2026
Supreme Court Closes Contempt Against Shukla After Apology
10 Mar 2026
Delhi Court Grants Sharjeel Imam 10-Day Interim Bail
10 Mar 2026
Mere Possession of Mobile Phone in Exam Hall Attracts Category-3 UFM Penalty Without Benefit of Doubt: Karnataka High Court
10 Mar 2026
NCLAT Excludes EPF Dues from Liquidation Estate
10 Mar 2026
Delhi HC Stays Trial Remarks in Excise Policy Case
10 Mar 2026
Back
Next 
RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
Janaki Ultra Sound Center, Jalna Road, Bhokardan, District Jalna, through authorized Handler – Appellant
Versus
Appropriate Authority Under PCPNDT Act and Naib Tahsildar, Bhokardan, District Jalna – Respondent
Headnote: Read headnote
1. On 02/02/2015, after hearing the petitioner and the learned AGP, I had passed the following order :-
"1. The petitioner whose Sonography Machine has been sealed on the ground of failure to maintain proper records and obtain the consent of the patient seeking to under go Sonography, is the only cause for the sealing of the Sonography machine.
2. The petitioner further submits that if at all documents are not properly maintained, they would evidence irregularity on the part of the petitioner. However, in the light of the judgment of this Court (Coram :- S.V. Gangapurwala, J.) dated 11-09-2012 delivered in Writ Petition No. 6557 of 2012 in the matter of Dr. Mrs. Sukhada W/o Dilip Mulay Vs State of Maharashtra & others, it clearly lays down the law in paragraph Nos. 16, 17 and 18 that the Sonography machines can be sealed by the appropriate authority only if it is satisfied that the said machine would furnish evidence of commission of offence punishable under the Act.
3
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
Listen Article