B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, A.P.BHANGALE
Ku. Alka – Appellant
Versus
Joint Director & Vice Chairman – Respondent
(Per B.P. Dharmadhikari, J)
In all these petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge is to order of the Scrutiny Committee functioning under Maharashtra Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Denotified Tribes (Vimukta Jatis), Nomadic Tribes, Other Backward Classes and Special Backward Category (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Caste Certificates Act, (Act No. 23 of 2001), invalidating the caste/tribe claim of respective petitioner. The petitioners seek protection in employment, in terms of Full Bench judgment of this Court in the matter of Arun Vishwanath Sonone .vrs. State of Maharashtra and others (2015 (1) Mh.L.J. 457). The said claim for protection is objected by the State Government, as also by their respective employers on the ground that their caste/tribe does not figure in the Government Resolution dated 15.06.1995 or later policy decision dated 30.06.2004, and hence benefit cannot be extended to them.
2. As the issue involved is same, as requested by the parties, we have heard the matters together. Some matters have been added afterward, after hearing the respective counsel therein. Thus, looking to the nature of the controv
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.