R.M. Borde, J.

1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties.

2. The petitioner was appointed as Member of the Child Welfare Committee, Ahmednagar, during the period 2008 to 2011. Her tenure was extended up to April 2015. Since performance of the petitioner was found to be satisfactory, she came to be appointed as Chairperson during the next tenure i.e. for the period till April 2016. There were two members of the Committee. One Dr. Rajendra Pawar and another Mr. Preetam Bedarkar came to be appointed as Members of the Committee along with the petitioner.

3. The petitioner contends that she performed her duties honestly and to the best of her ability. She received a communication dated 30.01.2014 issued by Respondent No.5 directing her to remain present for a meeting which was convened on 31.01.2014. It is the contention of the petitioner that she caused appearance before the Assistant Commissioner, Pune on 31.01.2014 and thereupon she learnt that an inquiry has been proposed against her. An application was tendered by the petitioner on the same day requesting to supply copies of the documents mentioned in