ROSHAN DALVI
Sunita Parulekar @ Neeta Parulekar – Appellant
Versus
Sudha Parulekar – Respondent
1. The plaintiffs are mother and son. Plaintiff No.1 is the daughter-in-law of defendant No.1 and the sister-in-law of defendant No.2. The plaintiffs have sued for administration of the estate of the deceased husband of plaintiff No.1 as also the deceased father-in-law of plaintiff No.1. The father-in-law of plaintiff No.1 is stated to have expired on 12.04.2003. The husband of plaintiff No.1 is stated to have expired on 23.04.2003, a mere 11 days after the death of his father.
2. The suit property is one residential flat. The suit flat admittedly belonged to the father-in-law of plaintiff No.1. The plaintiffs claim 1/3rd share each in the estate of the husband of plaintiff No.1 and 1/3rd of 1/3rd share of the husband of plaintiff No.1 in the estate of the father-in-law of plaintiff No.1. The plaintiffs claim that when the father-in-law expired on 12.04.2003, his wife (defendant No.1), his daughter (defendant No.2) and the husband of plaintiff No.1 were the only heirs. The husband of plaintiff No.1 would obtain 1/3rd of his estate (and accordingly 1/3rd of the suit flat) of his father. He expired 11 days thereafter. The plaintiffs claim that that 1/3rd share would devolv
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.