Balasaheb Gurling Todkari vs State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2015 Supreme(Bom) 820

V.K.TAHILRAMANI, INDIRA K.JAIN
Balasaheb Gurling Todkari – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants:U.R. Agandsurve, Madhav J. Jamdar, P.G. Sarda, Swapnil Ovalekar, Legal Aid Committee, Advocates.
For the Respondent:R2, R4, Ritesh Thobde, Advocate, A.S. Shitole, APP.

Judgment :-

Indira K. Jain, J.

These appeals arise out of judgment and order dated 21st March, 2012 passed by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Solapur in Sessions Case No.60 of 2006. By the said judgment and order, trial Court convicted the Appellants original Accused Nos.1 and 3 to 11 under sections 364, 365, 368, 302, 120-B, 201 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

The details of the punishment under various sections are as under:

Accused Nos.	Under Sections	Sentence
1 and 3 to 11	120-B of the Indian Penal Code	Rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and fine of Rs.5,000/- each in default 1 year 3 months imprisonment.
1 and 3 to 11	364 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code	Rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs.5,000/- each in default imprisonment of 2 and 1/2 years each.
1 and 3 to 11	368 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code	Rigorous imprisonment for 3 years and fine of Rs.1,000/- each in default further imprisonment of 9 mon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2015 Supreme(Bom) 820

V.K.TAHILRAMANI, INDIRA K.JAINBalasaheb Gurling Todkari – AppellantVersusState of Maharashtra – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

V.K.TAHILRAMANI, INDIRA K.JAIN
Balasaheb Gurling Todkari – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent