1. Heard. Admit. Shri Khandeparkar, learned Counsel waives service on behalf of the respondent. Heard finally with the consent of the parties.

2. By this revision application, the petitioner is challenging the judgment and order dated 22.05.2015, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Margao, in Criminal Appeal No. 5/2015. By the impugned judgment, the learned Sessions Judge has confirmed the order dated 09.01.2015, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vasco-da-Gama, rejecting the application (Exhibit-10) filed by the petitioner.

3. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the criminal revision may be stated thus:

That the parties are husband and wife. They were married on 27.08.2008 and the marriage is registered in the office of Sub-Registrar of Bardez at Mapusa. Sometime thereafter, the marriage ran into rough weather and disputes arose between the parties. It is undisputed that both, the petitioner and the respondent have filed separate matrimonial petitions, seeking dissolution of marriage. The respondent had lodged a complaint against the petitioner, under Section 498-A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. According