SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Bom) 1060

T.V.NALAWADE
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Sau. Mangala Rajesh Kothari – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. S.B. Pulkundwar, APP for State/petitioner.
Mr. U.S. Malte, Advocate for respondent.

Judgment

1) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard both the sides for final disposal.

2) The petition is filed by the State to challenge the judgment and order of Criminal Revision Application No. 2/2013 which was pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, District Ahmednagar. The Sessions Court has discharged present respondent in a police case filed for the offences punishable under sections 420, 468, 471, 34 etc. of Indian Penal Code. It can be said that section 120-B of I.P.C. also can be used. Both the sides are heard.

3) The crime was registered on the basis of report given by one Police Officer, A.P.I. Some incidents of creation of false record for filing claim petitions under the provisions of Motor Vehicle Act were noticed in the Tribunal from Kopargaon. There were 15 such incidents. Inquiry was made by learned Additional District Judge, Kopargaon and he found that forged record of police papers was created by using some crime numbers and by using tricky zerox. In some cases by personification, the claims were filed by persons who were not real victims or relatives of victims of the accident. In some cases, false record of cause of death an






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top