1. Learned Advocates for both the sides have stated that they have no objection if this Court hears this matter.

2. Rule.

3. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith and the petition is taken up for final disposal.

4. The petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order dated 19.3.2012, delivered by the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar. The relevant prayer made in this petition reads as under:-

“(A) By issuing appropriate writ, order, direction or any other order in nature of Writ, the Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to quash and set aside the judgment and order dated 19.3.2012 passed by learned Member, Industrial Court, Ahmednagar in Revision (ULP) No. 86 of 2011, thereby confirming judgment and order passed by learned Member, Industrial Court, Ahmednagar in Complaint (ULP) No. 28 of 2004.” (Should be read as Labour Court, Ahmednagar in Complaint (ULP) No. 28 of 2004).

5. This petition is prosecuted by Smt. Sangita Deepak Kamble, who is the legal representative of the deceased employee Deepak Bhimraj Kamble.

6. Shri Barde, learned Advocate summarises his contentions in brief as follows:-

(a) The deceased joined service on 21.12.1997.

(b) He was charge sheeted on 30.4.