V.K.TAHILRAMANI, A.S.GADKARI
DEEPAK BAPURAO YEDAGE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
(Per Smt. V.K. Tahilramani, J.):
1. The appellant original accused has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 30th November 2006 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pandharpur in S.C. No.18 of 2005. By the said judgment and order, the learned Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for causing death of Indubai. The appellant was also convicted under Sections 324 and 452 of IPC for entering into the house of PW-7 Pradeep and PW-8 Suman and causing them injuries with Sura. For the offence punishable under Section 302 of IPC the appellant was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1000/-, in default to undergo R.I. for 3 months. For the offence punishable under Section 324 of IPC, the appellant was sentenced to undergo R.I. For 3 months and to pay fine of Rs.500/-, in default to undergo S.I. for 3 months. For the offence punishable under Section 452 of IPC, the appellant was sentenced to undergo R.I for 6 months and to pay fine of Rs.500/-, in default to undergo S.I. for 3 months. The learned Sessions Judge directed that all sentences of imprisonment shall run concurrently.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.