1] Rule. With the consent of and at the request of learned counsel for the parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith.

2] This Civil Revision Application is directed against the following orders:

(i) Order dated 14 January 2015 in Review Application No. 3 of 2014 in Appeal No. 709 of 2008 made by the Division Bench of the Small Causes Court (Appeal Court);

(ii) Order dated 23 October 2012 in Appeal No. 709 of 2008 made by the Appeal Court; and

(iii) Judgment and decree dated 8 October 2007 made in R.A.D. Suit No. 678 of 2001 by the Small Causes Court (Trial Court).

3] The aforesaid impugned orders have declared the respondent No.1, the plaintiff in R.A.D. Suit No. 678 of 2001 (Patwardhan) to be the tenant in respect of the suit premises and the applicant herein, a rival claimant to the tenancy of the suit premises has been directed by a mandatory injunction to remove his lock upon the suit premises within four months from the date of decree. The permanent injunction as also been granted against the applicant from entering and using the suit premises without taking recourse to the due process of law.

4] The suit premises, in the present case, is Room No. E30, 3rd Floor, Tara Bau