R.K.DESHPANDE
Satish Mahadeorao Uke – Appellant
Versus
Devendra Gangadhar Fadnavis – Respondent
1. This election petition is filed challenging the election of the respondent No.1 on the grounds under Section 100(1)(d)(i) and (iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (for short, “the said Act”) for improper acceptance of his nomination paper by the Returning Officer. The substance of the averments made in the election petition is that the respondent No.1 has failed to disclose in his affidavit in Form No.26 submitted alongwith his nomination paper delivered under Section 33(1) of the said Act, the information, as required under Section 33A(1)(i) and (2) of the said Act, in respect of certain offences in which he is accused in a case pending before the Court of competent jurisdiction. The nomination of the respondent No.1 was required to be rejected under Section 36(2)(b) of the said Act and the result of the election of the respondent No.1 has materially affected by such improper acceptance of his nomination, as contemplated under Section 100(1)(d)(i) and (iv) of the said Act.
2. The respondent No.1 has filed his written statement and opposed the claim made
Krishnamoorthy v. Sivakumarand others reported in (2015) 3 SCC 467
Jabar Singh v. Genda Lal [AIR 1964 SC 1200]
Santosh Yadav Vs. Narender Singh [(2002) 1 SCC 160]
G.S. Iqbal Vs. K.M. Khader & Ors. [(2009) 11 SCC 398]
Mangani Lal Mandal Vs. Bishnu Deo Bhandari [(2012) 3 SCC 314]
Shambhu Prasad Sharma Vs. Charandas Mahant & Ors. [(2012) 11 SCC 390]
Arikala Narasa Reddy Vs. Venkata Ram Reddy Reddygari & Anr. [(2014) 5 SCC 312]
Kisan Shankar Kathore v. Arun Dattatray Sawant and others
Union of India v. Association of Democratic Reforms
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.