SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 2311

R.G.KETKAR
Sitaram – Appellant
Versus
Sow. Kaveribai – Respondent


Advocate Appeared:
For appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff:R.R. Mantri i/b Swapnil S. Patil, Advocates
For Respondents/Defendant:Younus B. Pathan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

R.G. Ketkar, J.

1. Heard Mr. R.R. Mantri, learned counsel for the appellants, Mr. Younus B. Pathan, learned counsel for respondent No. 1, Mr. S.P. Dound, learned Assistant Govt. Pleader for respondent No. 2-State and Mr. V.I. Thole, learned counsel for respondents No. 3 to 5 at length.

2. By this Appeal, u/s. 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, ' C.P.C.'), original plaintiffs have challenged the Judgment and decree dated 16/02/2010 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Aurangabad in R.C.A. No. 49 of 2009. By that order, learned District Judge allowed the Appeal preferred by original defendants No. 3 to 5 and quashed and set aside the Judgment and decree dated 23/02/2009 passed by the learned 2nd Jt. Civil Judge, Senior Division, Aurangabad in R.C.S. No. 202/2002. The learned District Judge dismissed the Suit. The parties shall herein after be referred to as per their status in the trial Court. The facts and circumstances giving rise to filing of the present Appeal, briefly, stated are as below.

3. The appellants instituted R.C.S. No. 202/2002 in the Co




































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top