SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 2230

B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, A.M.BADAR
Dheeraj – Appellant
Versus
Kavita – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Pramod Patni, Advocate
For the Respondents:Rajendra Deshmukh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.

1. Judgment delivered on 15th June, 2011 by the Judge, Family Court, Aurangabad in Petition No.B-1/2010 is questioned by the husband in Appeal No.21/2011 and by wife in Appeal No.22/11. Proceedings before the Family Court, Aurangabad were presented on 15th March, 2010 by husband Dheeraj against wife Kavita U/Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [In short, "the Act".] for declaring marriage between them performed on 20th December, 2009 as null and void.

2. Considering the nature of controversy, it appears, the earlier this Court has made efforts to dispose of these Appeals finally however, the Judgment could not be delivered.

3. We have heard Mr. Pramod Patni, learned counsel for Dheeraj husband and Mr. Rajendra Deshmukh, learned counsel for Kavita wife, in both the matters.

4. Basic facts are not in dispute. Family Court, Aurangabad framed following issues and answered the same as mentioned below

Issue

Findings

1. Whether the petitioner proves that the respondent was having a spouse living at the time of marriage with him on


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top