A.M.THIPSAY
Yashwant – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
A.M. Thipsay, J.
1. Rule. By consent, Rule made returnable forthwith.
2. By consent, heard finally.
3. The petitioners are the accused in C.R. No. 20 of 2014 registered at Vengurla Police Station. The case was initially registered in respect of offences punishable u/s. 354 IPC,323 IPC, 341 IPC, 504 IPC, 506 IPC r/w section 149 of the IPC and section 143 of the IPC. The case was registered on 5th April 2014. It appears that though the names of the petitioners were mentioned as the accused in the FIR, none of them was arrested till 9th April 2014, on which date the petitioners surrendered themselves before the Judicial Magistrate First Class at Vengurla. Along with the application for surrender, the petitioners also made a prayer for bail, contending that all the offences allegedly committed by them, were bailable. When on 9th April 2014, the petitioners had surrendered themselves before the Magistrate, the police had filed a report in which, while mentioning the offences allegedly committed by the petitioners, reference was made to section 354A IPC, instead section 354 IPC in respect of which, initially the case had been registered. Apparently, the police had later changed the pen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.