SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 2238

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
P.V. Hardas and G.S. Kulkarni, JJ.
Milind Ramchandra Gharat – Appellant
Vs.
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Criminal Appeal No. 225 of 2014
Decided On: 01.12.2014

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Shrish Gupte, Sr. Counsel i/b Nitin Sejpal and Pooja Sejpal/Bhojne
For the Respondents: H.J. Dedhia, APP

Headnote:Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 32 Reliability of dying declaration. An oral dying declaration, being a weak piece of evidence, cannot be relied upon to record conviction. Apart from that, an oral dying declaration is primarily a weak piece of evidence and unless the Court finds that implicit reliance can be placed on the evidence relating to oral dying declaration, no conviction can be based on the oral dying declaration. In the present case, that implicit reliance cannot be placed on the testimony of PW 4 ’D’ and therefore, even the oral dying declaration cannot be made the basis for sustaining conviction of the appellant.

       [INDIAN] PENAL CODE, 1860 - Sections 302, 354 and 452 Conviction for murder based on dying declaration. In absence of any evidence against accused for alleged offence of murder of deceased, dying declaration suffered from serious infirmity, cannot be relied upon to record conviction of accused.

JUDGMENT

P.V. Hardas, J.

1. The Appellant who stands convicted for the offence punishable under sections 302, 452and 354 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.25,000/- in default of which to undergo R.I. for 3 years and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/-in default of which further R.I. for 3 months and R.I. for 6 months and to pay fine of Rs.500/- in default to undergo further S.I. for 15 days respectively, by the Sessions Judge, Raigad- Alibag by Judgment dated 3rd March 2014 by this appeal questions the correctness of his conviction and sentence.

Facts as are necessary for decision of this appeal may be stated thus :

2. PW 13 - API Suresh Warankar who on 16th May 2007 was attached to Panvel city police station and was on duty received a telephone call from Gandhi Hospital at 10.45 a.m. He was informed about admission of injured Pratibha and the appellant in hospital with injuries. He accordingly proceeded to the hospital for recording the dying declaration. On reaching hospital, he contacted Resident Medical Officer and requested him to ascertain if the injured were in a fit condition to give their statements. The Medical Officer on examining the injured opined that injured Pratibha was in a fit condition to give her statement. PW 13 - API Suresh Warankar accordingly recorded the dying declaration of Pratibha at Exhibit 52. In the said dying declaration, Pratibha had disclosed that the appellant as usual had come to her house and had poured kerosene on her from a can and had set her ablaze. PW 13 -API Suresh Warankar thereafter obtained thumb impression of Pratibha on the dying declaration and also requested the Medical Officer to put his endorsement on the dying declaration. He thereafter, recorded statement of the appellant at Exhibit 53. After coming to the police station, he forwarded both statements to NRI Sagari police station and also intimated NRI Sagari police station on telephone.

3. PW 11 - PSI Sambhaji Salokhe who on 16th May 2007 was attached to NRI Sagari police station was handed over the dying declaration of Pratibha by PW 12- Sr.P.I. Kisan Bahure. On the basis of dying declaration of Pratibha at Exhibit 52 he registered an offence vide Crime No.I-44/2007 under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code. PW 11- PSI Sambhaji Salokhe along with PW 12- Sr.P.I. Kisan Bahure proceeded to the scene of the incident. On reaching the scene of the incident, he noticed half burnt clothes as well as a half burnt shirt. One mobile hand set was also found. A kerosene can, match box and a burnt matchstick were found. A cash memo in the name of Ravindra Kathor Patil was also found there. These articles were seized from the scene of incident and a panchanama was drawn in presence of witnesses at Exhibit 40. Photographs of the scene of the incident were taken. Statements of witnesses were recorded. Further investigation was then entrusted to PW 12-Sr.P.I. Kiran Bahure who was attached to NRI Sagari police station with investigation of Crime No.I-44/2007. He recorded statements of the witnesses and also recorded supplementary statements. On 5th October, 2007 he arrested the appellant under a arrest panchanama at Exhibit 21. On 1st June, 2007 the seized property was referred to the Chemical Analyser under requisition at Exhibit 48. Report of the Chemical Analyser is at Exhibit 49. Further to the completion of investigation, charge sheet against the appellant was submitted.

4. On the case being committed to the Court of Sessions, the trial Court vide Exhibit 9 framed charge against the appellant for the offence punishable under sections 452, 354 and302 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant vide Exhibit 10 denied his guilt and claimed to be tried. Prosecution in support of its case examined 13 witnesses. Defence of the appellant was of denial in respect of setting deceased Pratibha ablaze. The trial Court by relying on evidence of the prosecution convicted and sentenced the appellant as afore










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top