SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Bom) 1493

M.L.TAHALIYANI
Vasant S. Gala – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For Appellant :Deepak Sharma, Advocate
For Respondents: Rajesh More, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

M.L. Tahaliyani, J.

1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner is present in both the petitions. Learned APP Mr. More is present for Respondent No. 1 State. None for respondent No. 2. Admitted. Heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP.

2. The petitioner is the complainant in complaint case Nos. 1355/SS/2014 and 1354/SS/2014. His complaints filed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against respondent No. 2 have been ordered to be returned to the complainant on the ground that the cheque had been dishonoured not within jurisdiction of Metropolitan Magistrate, 38th Court, Kurla, Mumbai. Learned Magistrate has further observed that the stage of section 145(2) of the Act had not reached. Therefore, complaints have been ordered to be returned to the complainant/petitioner.

3. Learned Advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has filed his affidavit of evidence in both the cases on 14-8-2014 and that therefore, both the cases had reached section 145(2) of the Act. This Court in earlier judgments has said that once an affidavit under section 145(1) of the Act has been file


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top