ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA, G.S.KULKARNI
Lawyers' Forum for General Utility & Litigating Public – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
ABHAY SHREENIWAS OKA, J.
1. An important issue is raised in these proceedings regarding the powers of the Chief Justice of this Court to transfer a matter pending before a Bench of this Court to its principal seat by exercising administrative powers vesting in him as the Master of Roster. Another important issue involved in these Petitions is as regards the legality and validity of the Proviso to Rule 2 of Chapter XXXI of the Bombay High Court (Appellate Side) Rules, 1960 (for short "the Appellate Side Rules"). This challenge is in Writ Petition No. 1860 of 2014 (which is transferred from the Bench at Aurangabad). In Writ Petition No. 8182 of 2012, the challenge is to the legality and validity of the general orders dated 24th February 1993 and 6th January 2010 issued under the directions of the Hon'ble the Chief Justice of this Court on the administrative side by which he directed that certain categories of matters pending at Panaji, Aurangabad and Nagpur Benches of this Court stand transferred to the principal seat of this Court at Mumbai. The said orders have been passed in exercise of powers under Rules 1, 2 and 3 of Chapter XXXI of the Appellate Side Rules. In Writ Peti
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad vs. Raj Kishore Yadav
Manju Varma vs. State of U.P. and Others
Vivekanand Nidhi & Others vs. Asheema Goswami
Jitendra Singh vs. Bhanu Kumari & Others
Monnet Ispat and Energy Limited vs. Jan Chetna and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.