Back
RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
Chandrakala – Appellant
Versus
Marathwada Medical Research and Rural Development Institution Ltd – Respondent
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties.
2. On 25.08.2015, this Court has passed the following order:
“1. The learned Advocates submit on instructions from their respective clients present in the Court that they have no objection if this Court hears these matters.
2. These matters have been heard for almost two hours.
3. Stand over to 07.09.2015 at 02:30 pm as PARTHEARD, at the request of the learned Advocates.”
3. The Petitioners in the first petition challenge the judgment and order dated 11.12.2013 passed by the Industrial Court at Aurangabad by which Complaint (ULP) No.47/2008 filed by the Petitioners was dismissed.
4. The Petitioners in the second petition are aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 11.12.2013 passed by the Industrial Court, Aurangabad by which Complaint (ULP) No.97/2008 filed by these Petitioners has been dismissed.
5. The Petitioners in the third petition are aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 11.12.2013 passed by the Industrial Court, Aurangabad by which Complaint (ULP) No.50/2008 filed by these Petitioners has been dismissed.
6. The Petitioners in these petitions are identically placed. They hav
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
