Heard.

2) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with the consent of parties.

3) Petitioner herein questions the correctness and validity of the order dated 29/01/2013 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Satara in Criminal Revision Application No. 15 of 2012.

4) Petitioner herein happens to be appropriate authority under the Preconception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994 (Hereinafter referred as PCPNDT Act). Petitioner herein filed a complaint against present respondent i.e. Dr. R.Y. Kadam who runs Mukta Hospital at Satara Road Taluka Koregaon. It is alleged that appropriate authority had reliably learnt that Dr. R.Y. Kadam i.e. present respondent is conducting his profession in utter violation of provisions of PCPNDT Act, 1994. That he has indulged into the activities such as detection of sex of the foetus and disclosing the same to the pregnant women. That with the aid and assistance of Advocate Varsha Deshpande (Member of District Advisory Committee). Petitioner had decided to verify the genuineness of the information received by him. That one pregnant woman Smt. Tanubai Sambhaji Madane was contacted by Advocate Varsha Deshpande. S