SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Bom) 2263

V.K.TAHILRAMANI, A.S.GADKARI
Jay – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Police Pune – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :U.N. Tripathi, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

V.K. Tahilramani, Actg. C.J.

1. Through this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner - detenu Jay @ Nunya Rajesh Bhosale has impugned the detention order dated 19.5.2015 passed by respondent No. 1 Commissioner of Police of Pune detaining him under sub-section (2) of Section 3 of The Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Dangerous Persons and Video Pirates Act, 1981 (Mah. Act No. LV of 1981) (Amendment-1996) (Amendment - 2009) (Hereinafter referred to as the "MPDA" Act.)

The detention order along with grounds of detention which are also dated 19.5.2015 was served on the petitioner on 19.5.2015 and their true copies have been annexed as Annexure-A and B to this petition. A perusal of the grounds of detention (Annexure B) shows that the detention order has been based on two CRs. and three incamera statements. The first CR i.e. CR No. 91 of 2015 of Faraskhana Police Station is under Sections 384, 386 and 504 of IPC. The second CR i.e. CR No. 3088 of 2015 of Faraskhana Police Station is under Sections 37(1)(3) read with 135 of Maharashtra Police Act and under Section 4 read with Se


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top