SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Bom) 2242

SADHANA S.JADHAV
Ravindra Narayan Joshi – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For Appellant : P.D. Deshpande, Adv.
For Respondents: P.P. Shinde, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT

Sadhana S. Jadhav, J.

1. Appellants herein are convicted for offence punishable under section 7 and offence punishable under section 13(1)(d); (i) and (ii) punishable under section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act. Appellants are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years each and fine of Rs. 5,000/- each i/d. to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for 15 months for offence punishable under section 7 of Prevention of Corruption Act. Both accused are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three years each and fine of Rs. 3,000/- each i/d. to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for 9 months in Special Case No. 12 of 1991 by Special Judge Solapur vide Judgment and Order dated 28/06/1994. Hence, this appeal. Such of the facts necessary for the decision of this appeal are as follows. It is the case of prosecution that one Ramesh Ganpat Gurav, an agriculturist also works as contractor. He filed a tender for excavation of the canal and construction of walls of canal in Kurul sub-division No. 20 in June 1986. Appellant No. 1 Ravindra Joshi was serving as an Assistant Engineer in Sub-division No. 20 and Shri. Narayan Mane was serving as Junior Engineer in






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top