SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Bom) 2075

V.K.TAHILRAMANI, I.K.JAIN
Anita – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant: Vijay Hiremath and Harshad Bhadbhade, Advs.
For the Respondents: V.R. Bhonsale, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

I.K. Jain, J.

1. Criminal Appeal 530 of 2012 has been preferred by the original accused No. 1 Anita alias Meena Rajendra Khandabale. The original accused No. 2 Ajay Anant Ghag has preferred Criminal Appeal No. 510 of 2014. In both the appeals, Appellants have challenged their conviction and sentence passed by the learned 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No. 418 of 2008 vide Judgment and Order dated 20.01.2012. By the said Judgment and Order, the learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted and sentenced the Appellants as under:-

Convicted u/S.

Sentenced to

120-B IPC

Rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and fine of Rs. 2,500/- each, in default rigorous imprisonment for 6 months each.

302 r/w. 34 IPC

Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.2,500/- each, in default rigorous imprisonment for 6 months each.

394 r/w. 120-B IPC

Imprisonment for life and fine of Rs.2,500/- each, in default rigorous imprisonment for 6 months each.

The learned Sessions Judged directed that the substantiv



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top