A.S.OKA, A.S.GADKARI
Arjun Sitaram Nitanwar – Appellant
Versus
Tahsildar, District Thane – Respondent
Abhay Shreeniwas Oka, J.
1. The Petitioner is the Constituted Attorney of one Shri Ashwin Chunilal Dalai. The said Ashwin Dalai is claiming to be a Lessee of the lands bearing Gat Nos. 7/1, 7/2, 7/3 and 7/6 at village Yeoor, Taluka and District Thane of the Investment Provident Company. The lands bearing Gat Nos. 7/1, 7/2, 7/3 and 7/6 are hereinafter referred to as "the said lands". The 7/12 extracts of the said lands (of the date prior to Mutation Entry No. 616) annexed to this Petition show that in the Kabjedar Column, the name of the Government of India appeared through the Investment Provident Company. The name of Shri G.G. Pradhan, as the Manager of the said Company also appeared in the Kabjedar Column. The name of the said Ashwin appeared alongwith four others in the other rights column as well as in cultivation column. The said Ashwin is hereafter referred as the Petitioner as this Petition has been filed by his Constituted Attorney. A Mutation Entry No. 616 was made on 23rd May, 2006 in relation to the said lands along with several other lands at village Yeur, Taluka and District Thane. The said Mutation Entry refers to a notice issued under Section 35 of the India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.