SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 2397

B.R.GAVAI, V.M.DESHPANDE
Anil – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Harshal Bobade and U.K. Kalsi, Advs.
For the Respondents: R.S. Nayak, A.P.P.

JUDGMENT :

B.R. Gavai, J.

1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order passed by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati dated 17.8.2010 in Sessions Trial No. 35/08, thereby convicting the appellants for the offence punishable under Sections 302 & 342 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing them under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code to suffer R.I. for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5,000/- and in default, to suffer further R.I. for six months, and sentencing them under Section 342 of the Indian Penal Code to suffer R.I. for three months and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- and in default, to suffer further R.I. for 15 days, the appellants have approached this Court. The prosecution story, in brief, as could be gathered from the material placed on record is as under:--

On 5.11.2007 the Police Station Rajapeth received a telephonic information that two persons were apprehended in Kanha Apartment at Badnera Road, Amravati. On receipt of the information, the police personnel from the Rajapeth Police Station went to the spot. They received the information that one person was set on fire in one room of the Kanha Apartment. The police party apprehended two p



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top