Z.A.HAQ
Bajarang Labour Cooperative Society – Appellant
Versus
Divisional Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies – Respondent
Based on the provided legal document, here are the key points:
References: (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)
1. These writ petitions can be disposed by common judgment as same issue is raised in all the petitions.
2. Heard Shri A.S. Kilor, learned Advocate for the petitioners, Shri P.C. Madkholkar, learned Advocate for the respondent No.3 and Smt. S.S. Jachak and Shri V.P. Gangane, learned Assistant Government Pleaders for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
3. The petitioners are the Labour Cooperative Societies registered under the provisions of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act of 1960). The petitioner societies applied to the respondent No.3 Nagpur District Labour Cooperative Societies Federation Limited requesting for grant of membership. It is the case of the petitioner societies that the respondent No.3-Federation had pointed out certain deficiencies in the applications submitted by the petitioner societies. According to the petitioner societies, they complied with the requirements and removed the deficiencies. According to the petitioner societies, the respondent No.3-Federation was required to communicate its decision on the applications submitted by the petitioner societies within sixty days as laid down by Section 23(1A) of the
Behari Kunj Sahakari Awas Samiti and another vs. State of U.P. and others
Behari Kunj Sahkari Awas Samiti VS State Of U. P. - 1997 7 Supreme 609: The provided text describes a legal principle regarding the Custodian General's inability to exercise revisional jurisdiction under Section 27 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act when an order has already been approved by the Assistant Custodian General (Custodian General's delegate). There are no keywords or phrases indicating any judicial treatment by subsequent decisions, such as "followed," "distinguished," "criticized," "questioned," "overruled," "reversed," or "abrogated." The treatment is entirely unclear based on the information provided, as it appears to be a standalone statement of law without reference to how it has been handled in later cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.