SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 2485

S.B.SHUKRE
SAMEER SUDHIR JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Firdos Mirza.
For the Respondent: A.H. Laddhad.

ORDER :-

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned APP.

2. This is an application filed under Section 439 (1) of Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of bail.

3. On the basis of the complaint lodged by some of the investors of the company of the applicant, namely Shrisurya Investment (HUF) Company that police station Khadan, Akola, has registered offences punishable under Sections 420, 468, 471 and 120B read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and also under Section 3 of Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act (for short MPID ACT), 1999.

4. It is alleged that the applicant together with co-accused established a company, Shrisurya Investment (HUF) Company, and made a false representation to various investors that if amounts were invested in this company, the company would utilize the deposits of the investors for earning some profits through other businesses and, in turn, would give attractive returns on investment to its various investors. The returns that were promised by this applicant and his co-accused were in the nature of payments of interest accrued on the deposits at the rates ranging from 40% to 100%. It has been furt











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top