SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Bom) 419

INDIRA K.JAIN
Vinod – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. R.S. Deshmukh, Advocate for Appellant.
Mrs. R.K. Ladda, APP for Respondent.

JUDGMENT:

This appeal takes an exception to the judgment and order dated 20th February, 2004 passed by the learned Special Judge, Nanded in Special (ACB) Case No.2 of 1994 convicting the Appellant for the offences punishable Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as under:

Conviction under Section

Sentence

7

Simple Imprisonment for six months and fine of Rs.200/in default Simple Imprisonment for fifteen days.

13 (2)

Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs.300/in default Simple Imprisonment for one month.

2. Prosecution case in brief is as under :

On 12th September, 1993 Madhukar and Ramesh brothers-in-law of Complainant Shivram Tukaram Kharde were arrested by Shivajinagar Police Station, Nanded. They were taken to Tahsil office in the evening. Accused was serving as junior clerk in Tahsil office. He was to assist senior clerk PW6 Padhye working in the office of Executive Magistrate. Complainant was informed that his brothers-in-law were arrested and so he rushed to Tahsil office. He was told by Accused to come on next day as re












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top