SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Bom) 2424

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MAHARASHTRA
M. Yusuf Eqbal, Kurian Joseph, JJ.
Sandu (dead) by L.Rs. - Petitioner
Vs.
Gulab (dead) by L.Rs. - Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 3470 of 2006
Decided On : 04-09-2015

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shivaji M. Jadhav, Anish R. Shah

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the revisional authority can exercise its jurisdiction within a reasonable time, even if it exceeds the prescribed time limit, and that the Collector cannot drop proceedings if a tribal transferor is not interested in getting back the land.

Headnote:

Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act - Restoration of lands of persons belonging to Scheduled Tribes - 4, 5-A, 6, 7 - The judgment discusses the provisions of sections 4, 5-A, 6, and 7 of the Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. It highlights the process of restoration of lands to tribal persons, the vesting of lands in the government, appeal and revision procedures, and the time limitations for exercising revisional jurisdiction.

Fact of the Case:

The Assistant Collector initiated proceedings under section 4 of the Act for the restoration of land to a tribal person. However, the restoration was declined as the tribal person was not willing to purchase the land. Subsequently, the revisional authority set aside the earlier order and held the land liable for restoration. The order of the revisional authority was challenged before the High Court.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court held that the revisional authority could exercise its jurisdiction within a reasonable time, even though it was beyond the three-year limit prescribed by the Act. The Court also emphasized that the Collector cannot drop the proceedings if a tribal transferor is not interested in getting back the land, and the land should be divested from the non-tribal transferee and vested in the State Government for distribution to other deserving tribals.

Issues: The issues revolved around the exercise of revisional jurisdiction beyond the prescribed time limit, the authority of the Collector to drop proceedings, and the restoration of land to tribal transferors.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court emphasized that the revisional authority can exercise its jurisdiction within a reasonable time, even if it exceeds the prescribed time limit, and that the Collector cannot drop proceedings if a tribal transferor is not interested in getting back the land.

Final Decision: The impugned order was set aside, and the Writ Petition was remitted to the High Court for fresh consideration. The State of Maharashtra, the revisional authority, and the original authority were directed to be impleaded as parties. The appeal was allowed, and the High Court was requested to dispose of the Writ Petition within six months.

JUDGMENT :

Kurian Joseph, J.

The Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') was introduced to provide for the restoration of certain lands to persons belonging to the scheduled tribes. It has been notified on 1-11-1975. Under section 4 of the Act, the restoration is contemplated in respect of transactions on or after 1st day of April, 1957. Section 4 reads as follows :

"4. Restoration of lands of persons belonging to Scheduled Tribes. - Where any land of a Tribal is, at any time on or after the 1st day of April, 1957 and before the 6th day of July, 1974, purchased or deemed to have been purchased or acquired under or in accordance with the provisions of the relevant tenancy law by a non-Tribal-transferee or where any acquisition has been regularised on payment of penalty under such law and such land is in possession of a non-Tribal transferee and has not been put to any non-agricultural use on or before the 6th day of July, 1974, then the Collector shall, notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, either suo motu at any time or on an application by the Tribunal made within thirty years from the 6th July 2004 and after making such inquiry as he thinks fit, direct that the land shall, subject to the provisions of sub-section (4) of section 3, be restored to the Tribal free from all encumbrances and that the amount of purchase price or a proportionate part thereof, if any, paid by such non-Tribal-transferee in respect of such lands in accordance with the relevant tenancy law shall be refunded to such non-Tribal-transferee either lump sum or in such annual instalments not exceeding twelve (with simple interest at 4½ per cent. per annum) as the Collector may direct. The provisions of clauses (d), (e), (f) and (g) of sub-section (4) of section 3 shall, so far as may be, apply in relation to the recovery of the amount from the Tribal and payment thereof to the non-Tribal-transferee and the persons claiming encumbrances, if any :

Provided that, where land is purchased or acquired by a non-Tribal-transferee before the 6th day of July, 1974, after such transferee was rendered landless by reason of acquisition of his land for a public purpose, then only half the land so purchased or acquired shall be restored to the Tribal-transferor."

2. Under section 5-A of the Act, lands which belonged to the tribals and coming under the purview of the Act which cannot be restored to the original tribals, vest in Government and such lands are to be granted to other tribals subject to prescribed restrictions.

"5-A. (1) Where any land (not being land acquired in exchange), which is liable to be restored to a Tribal-transferor under sub-section (1) of section 3 cannot be so restored either on account of the failure of the Tribal-transferor to give an undertaking referred to in sub-section (3) of section 3 or for any reason whatsoever or where any land referred to in section 4 cannot be restored to the Tribal by reason of such Tribal expressing, during the inquiry held by the Collector, his unwillingness to refund the purchase price or proportionate part thereof to the non-Tribal-transferee, as required by the said section 4, or for any other reason, then, the Collector may, subject to rules, if any, made in that behalf, by order in writing direct that the land shall, with effect from the date of the order, be deemed to have been acquired and vest in the State Government free from all encumbrances.

(2) On such vesting of the land, the non-Tribal-transferee shall be entitled to receive from the State Government an amount equal to 48 times the assessment of the land, plus the value of the improvements, if any, made by the non-Tribal-transferee therein. The provisions of clauses (b) and (c) of sub-section (4) of section 3 shall mutatis mutandis apply for determining the value of improvements and for apportionment of the encumbrances, if any, on the land between the non-Tribal





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top