T.V.NALAWADE
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
MANGALA RAJESH KOTHARI – Respondent
T.V. Nalawade, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, heard both the sides for final disposal.
2. The petition is filed by the State to challenge the judgment and order of Criminal Revision Application No. 2/2013 which was pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, District Ahmednagar. The Sessions Court has discharged present respondent in a police case filed for the offences punishable under sections 420, 468, 471, 34 etc. of Indian Penal Code. It can be said that section 120-B of Indian Penal Code also can be used. Both the sides are heard.
3. The crime was registered on the basis of report given by one Police Officer, A.P.I. Some incidents of creation of false record for filing claim petitions under the provisions of Motor Vehicle Act were noticed in the Tribunal from Kopargaon. There were 15 such incidents. Inquiry was made by learned Additional District Judge, Kopargaon and he found that forged record of police papers was created by using some crime numbers and by using tricky zerox. In some cases by personification, the claims were filed by persons who were not real victims or relatives of victims of the accident. In some cases, fal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.