SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Bom) 668

C.V.BHADANG
Abhaykumar Krishna Kamat – Appellant
Versus
Rajnish Udaykar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Anthony Rebello, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

C.V. Bhadang, J.

1. By this Appeal, the Appellant/Original Complainant is taking exception to the Judgment and Order dated 08.08.2012, recorded by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vasco da Gama, in Criminal Case No. 94/OA/NIA/2011/C by which the Respondent-Accused has been acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, ('Act', for short).

2. Briefly stated, it was the case of the Appellant that on account of friendship, the Appellant had accommodated the Respondent in the sum of Rs. 1,70,000/-. In the complaint filed before the learned Magistrate, the Appellant has set out the details of the payment which were made to the Respondent from time to time from December 2010 to May 2011. The Appellant further claimed that towards repayment of the said amount, the Respondent had issued a cheque bearing No. 231641 dated 15.09.2011 for a sum of Rs. 1,70,000/- in favour of the Appellant. The said cheque was drawn on Centurion Bank Ltd., Vasco da Gama branch. When the said cheque was presented for encashment through UCO Bank, the same was dishonoured with the endorsement that the concerned account of the Respondent was closed. The









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top