A.B.CHAUDHARI
Vasant – Appellant
Versus
Govindrao Upasrao Naik – Respondent
A.B. Chaudhari, J.
1. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 27.08.2014 in Petition No. E-35/2013 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Amravati, by which the applicant has been directed to pay Rs. 20,000/- per month each, totalling to Rs. 40,000/- from the date of filing of the Application i.e. 4.3.2013, to the father and mother of the applicant (original petitioners), the instant Revision has been filed.
FACTS:
2. The respondents herein, that is, applicants before the Family Court, Amravati - Govind and Mankarnabai, filed an Application under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the present applicant-Vasant, their son, for grant of maintenance in the sum of Rs. 20,000/- per month each, from the applicant. In their Application, they stated that they are the parents of the present applicant and have been residing in the house of their daughter Rajani in Prabhu Colony, Amravati. The applicant-son Vasant is serving in a high position in Saudi Polydlefins Limited, a Company in Saudi Arabia and receiving an eye-popping salary in the sum of Rs. 3 lakhs per month. The applicant-Vasant is the elder son possessing qualification of M.Sc.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.