A.S.CHANDURKAR
Keshavrao Attamaramji Pardhi – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Rule. Heard finally with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.
2. The order dated 26-9-2014 passed by the respondent No. 1 in proceedings under section 257 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 (for short, the Code) is under challenge in this writ petition.
3. The relevant facts are that the petitioner No. 4 is a trust registered under the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950. A mutation entry dated 20-10-1993 bearing No. 1753-D in respect of a property owned by the Trust came to be made in favour of one Sudamabai Sharma. The Trust challenged the said mutation entry in proceedings under section 247 of the Code. The Sub-Divisional Officer by order dated 14-8-1996 allowed the appeal and set aside the mutation entry. This order was continued by the Additional Collector on 15-7-1998. The revision application filed by said Sudamabai was not entertained by the Additional Commissioner as it was time barred. This order is dated 3-6-2004. Thereafter on 29-4-2013 a second revision application was preferred under section 257 of the Code before the State Government. By the impugned order, the revision application has been allowed and after setting aside the earlier or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.