SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Bom) 1100

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
B.R. Gavai, V.M. Deshpande, JJ.
Sonal Prakash Bakade - Petitioner
Vs.
Joint Commissioner & Vice Chairman, Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati - Respondent
W.P. No. 289 of 2016
Decided On : 22-08-2016

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: S.R. Narnaware
For the Respondent: Mrs. N. Mehta

The probative value of pre-independence documents and historical occupation in establishing tribal status.

Headnote:

Halbi-Scheduled Tribe - Caste Validity Certificate - 1929, 1918, 1940, 1930, 1945 - The court discussed the importance of pre-independence documents and their probative value in establishing the claim of belonging to a Scheduled Tribe. It also highlighted the significance of occupation and historical migration patterns in determining tribal status. The court relied on previous judgments and historical sources to support the petitioner's claim.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner challenged the rejection of her claim of belonging to Halbi-Scheduled Tribe after a delay of 10 years, stating that she was pursuing her studies and now required the caste certificate for job applications.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the delay in approaching the court should not be a ground for dismissing the petition, especially when previous judgments supported the petitioner's claim. The court emphasized the probative value of pre-independence documents and historical occupation in establishing tribal status.

Issues: Delay in approaching the court, probative value of pre-independence documents, occupation and historical migration patterns in determining tribal status.

Ratio Decidendi: The delay in approaching the court should not bar the petitioner, especially when previous judgments support the claim. Pre-independence documents and historical occupation are crucial in establishing tribal status.

Final Decision: The writ petition was allowed, and the respondent-Committee was directed to issue a Caste Validity Certificate validating the petitioner's caste within four weeks.

JUDGMENT :

B.R. Gavai, J.

Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.

2. The petitioner has approached this Court, being aggrieved by order dated 15-7-2005 thereby rejecting the claim of the petitioner of belonging to Halbi-Scheduled Tribe. The learned A.G.P. has raised a preliminary objection on the ground that the petitioner has approached after a period of 10 years and as such the petition is liable to be dismissed on the ground of delay and laches alone.

3. The petitioner has given an explanation stating therein that the petitioner being a meritorious candidate, after rejection of her claim she was pursuing her studies on her own merits. It is submitted that after completion of graduate and post graduate degree, the petitioner is now pursuing her Ph.D. in the faculty of Physics. It is submitted that the petitioner would now require the caste certificate/validity certificate for applying for the job.

4. We find that merely because for the last 10 years the petitioner has not challenged the order of the Scrutiny Committee, that cannot be a ground for closing down the doors of this Court to the petitioner. In any case, it is to be noted that this Court in the case of Priya d/o Pravin Parate vs. Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificates Scrutiny Committee Nagpur and others, 2013(1) Mh.L.J. 180, after relying on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Anand vs. Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims and others, 2011(6) Mh.L.J. 919 has, for the first time, decided an identical petition on 4/10/2012. It is to be noted that the facts in the case of Priya Parate (supra) and in the present case are almost identical. The petitioner therein so also the petitioner herein belong to the same town i.e. Achalpur.

5. In that view of the matter, we find that if the petitioner comes across a judgment of this Court deciding the matter in identical facts, merely because she has approached belatedly, it should not be a ground to non suit her.

6. Learned A.G.P. fairly concedes that insofar as the merits of the matter are concerned, case of the present petitioner is similar to that of Priya Parate (supra).

7. While deciding Priya Parate’s case, after taking into consideration judgment in the case of Anand, (supra) this Court has, in unequivocal terms, held that the pre-independence documents will have more probative value. It has been held that merely because a candidate fails in the affinity test, the pre-independence documents cannot be allowed to be ignored.

8. Insofar as the reasoning given by the Scrutiny Committee regarding occupation of the petitioner’s forefathers being written as Weaver (Koshti) is concerned, the Division Bench relying on the Gazetteer for Amravati District as well as from the authority of R.V. Russell on Tribes and Castes of the Central Provinces of India published in 1916, found that the original Halba/Halbi who had migrated from Bastar to various parts of Berar including Elichpur had take the profession of weaving. It was further held that merely because some stray entries as Koshti are recorded in respect of the caste, that cannot be considered contrary to their claim of belonging to Halba-Scheduled Tribe.

9. In the present case, the petitioner has placed on record the following documents, which are pre-Constitution documents in support of her claim of belonging to Halba/Halbi-Scheduled Tribe.

(i) Certificate issued in the name of Nago Baliramji Bakade (grandfather of petitioner) issued by Municipal Council Primary Marathi School, Abbaspura, Ilichpur. The said document shows the petitioner’s grandfather’s caste as Halbi. The said document is of the year 1929.

(ii) The second document is also issued in the name of grandfather of the petitioner which shows his date of birth to be 1-9-1918 and admission being taken on 24-9-1925. The said document also records the caste to be Halbi.

(iii) The third document is of Ramchandra Baliram Bakade (real brother of petitioner’s grandfather). The sa







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top