SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Bom) 1295

M.S.SANKLECHA, S.C.GUPTE
Somaiya Organo Chemicals Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay City – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicants : Mr. Nishant Thakkar with Ms. Jasmin Amalsadvala, Mr. Rajesh Poojary, Mulla & Mulla.

JUDGMENT :

S.C. GUPTE, J.

1. By this Reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (“Act”), the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“Tribunal”) has referred the following questions of law for our opinion:

“(a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the limit of Rs.40,000/- laid down in Section 37(3A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, could not be proportionately increased because the previous year relevant for the assessment year was seventeen months instead of twelve months?

(b) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the amount of Rs.28,983/- transferred out of Profit & Loss Account to Storage Fund for Molasses and Alcohol account to meet with the statutory requirements of Ethyl Alcohol (Price Control) Amendment Order, 1971, was not an admissible deduction in working out the business income?

(c) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the provisions of Section 40A(









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top