Mridula Bhatkar, J.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent, the Writ Petition is heard finally at the stage of admission.

2. In this Writ Petitioner, the petitioner/husband has challenged the order dated 18th March, 2014 and 19th January, 2015. The respondent/wife has filed the petition bearing no. A-250 of 2013 against the petitioner/husband under section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act for restitution of conjugal rights. She has also filed the petition bearing No. E- 122/2013 under section 125 of Cr. P.C. for grant of maintenance. By the order dated 18th March, 2014 the learned Judge of the Family Court, Nashik directed both the parties that common evidence is to be recorded in Petition No. A-250 of 2013 and the matters can be disposed of by the common judgment. Thereafter, common evidence was produced by the respondent/wife at Exhibit 20. At the request of petitioner/husband, the matter was adjourned and it was fixed on 27th November, 2014. However, the advocate of the petitioner/husband refused to take cross-examination. So, order of No cross-examination was passed. Then he moved an application for setting aside order of No Cross. Application Exhibit 34 was allowed a