NARESH H.PATIL, PRAKASH D.NAIK
Aannapaa Avdhut Haladvdru – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Prakash D. Naik, J.
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith.
2. Learned APP waives service for Respondent - State.
3. The petitioners in both these petitions have invoked writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as well as the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The issues involved in both these petitions are interconnected with each other and hence, the petitions are disposed of by common judgment and order. In both these petitions, the petitioners and the respective complainants have submitted that the parties involved therein have resolved their disputes and have approached this Court for quashing by consent, the respective criminal proceedings.
4. Criminal writ petition no.4995 of 2015 is preferred by the petitioners who are original accused in C.R. No.45 of 2015, registered with Umadi Police Station, District Sangli. The said FIR was registered at the instance of second respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 341, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code (for short “IPC”) and under Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act along with Section 135 of th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.