ABHAY M.THIPSAY
Raju @ Ajit Sarfraj Tadvi, Shantaram Manil Sonawane, Dhanraj Parashuram Chaudhari – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Abhay M. Thipsay, J.
1. The appellants were prosecuted on the allegation of having committed offences punishable under Sections 120B of Indian Penal Code (IPC), Section 452 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, Section 342 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, Section 506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, Section 292 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, Section 385 IPC read with Section 34, Section 355 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, and Section 351 IPC read with Section 34 IPC. After holding a trial, the learned Additional Sessions Judge held the appellant No. 1 guilty of all the aforesaid offences and convicted him accordingly. She, however, held appellant Nos. 2 and 3 guilty only of the offences punishable under Section 452 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, Section 342 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, Section 506 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, and convicted them accordingly. The learned Additional Sessions Judge imposed the following sentences on the appellants:-
Offence punishable under Section
Sentence
Section 452 IPC read with Section 34 IPC
Appella
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.