A.M. BADAR, J.

1. By these appeals, appellants/original accused nos.1 to 4 are challenging the judgment and order dated 29th August 2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, convicting them of offences punishable under Sections 302, 326, 324 read with Section 34 of the IPC and sentencing them each to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for 3 months, for the offence punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC. For the offence punishable under Section 326 read with Section 34 of the IPC, appellants/ accused were sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for 3 months and for the offence punishable under Section 324 read with Section 34 of the IPC, they are sentenced to pay fine of Rs.500/-each, in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 1 month. The substantive sentences are directed to run concurrently.

2. Briefly stated, according to the prosecution case, PW2 Anwar Nimbargi was running a video game parlour in the name and style of A1 Video Games Parlour at Lonavala. Firoz Nimbargi (since